Sunday, August 26, 2007

2007 Blackburn Academic Symposium (Part 1)

So, here I was thinking that I'd be the only space blogger within a hundred miles of Tuscaloosa, AL that could get to Burt Rutan's talk at the Inaugural Gloria and John L. Blackburn Academic Symposium at the University of Alabama. Upon arriving however, I find none other than Jeff Foust sitting two rows in front of me. Oh well, so much for the scoop.

Ostensibly, the Blackburn Academic symposium was created as a forum to bring together academic, industrial, and political leaders to discuss issues facing the state of Alabama and the nation. The focus of this inaugural symposium was "Responsibility for the Future Exploration and Development of Space", and the list of invited guests reflected this theme. During the morning, there were two keynote speakers: Burt Rutan, and Dr. David King, director of NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The afternoon was taken up by two panels. The first discussed the roles of industry, government, and academia in the future of space exploration. The second featured three astronauts: Col. Jim "Vegas" Kelly, Dr. Jan Davis, and Col. Jim Voss; all of whom are alumni of Alabama universities. The event was free and open to the public.

Certainly, the highlight of the day, for me at least, was the talk by Burt Rutan. The topics brought up in his keynote address seemed to reverberate throughout the rest of the day. Mr. Rutan spoke of the interplay between inspiration and innovation in the field of aerospace, though his comments could certainly have broader application to just about any field of human achievement. The key thesis of his presentation was that nearly everyone who strives to do something difficult and meaningful in their adult lives were inspired by some seminal event or events at a crucial time in their childhood between the ages of 3 and 14. This observation was borne out again and again throughout the day as almost every other speaker at the symposium related their own personal story of childhood inspiration which lead to their desire to work in the area of spaceflight.

Mr. Rutan's own experience was playing with a model airplane in his back yard when a formation of B-52 bombers flew directly overhead. From that point on, he knew that he would work in the world of aviation. Even when he went to college in the mid-60's, during the height of the space race, he steered away from space-related engineering disciplines and focused on general aviation. From there his professional experience lead him down a path which would allow him to be both creative in aircraft design as well as attempt a number of significant aeronautical and aerospace milestones. Among these accomplishments were the Voyager aircraft which circled the globe non-stop back in the 80's, and of course, Space Ship One. He said, "It is important for an entrepreneur to attempt these milestone challenges if it is at all possible."

There was one other significant point brought up by Mr. Rutan, that would reemerge briefly later in the day. One of the main reasons why innovation in aerospace has been stagnating recently is not so much due to a deficiency in our educational system, but because no one has asked for any thing truly remarkable in recent memory. No one has dared to ask for the impossible since President Kennedy challenged America to send a man to the moon. The very best among us are compelled to seek out the most difficult challenges, and they will almost always rise to the occasion when presented with a daunting task. For the past 20 years, most of the innovators have been drawn to the challenges in computing, the internet, and more recently, in biotechnology. There simply have been no compelling challenges put forth in aerospace since the days of the development of the Concorde and the Space Shuttle. I was left to wonder if this deficiency came from a lack of vision or a sudden rise in risk aversion on the part of our nation's leaders.

Dr. David King gave his keynote address immediately following Burt Rutan, but the difference in presentation of the two speakers was striking. While Dr. King spoke of the Vision for Space Exploration and of the need to inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers, there was really nothing in his talk which reached in and grabbed me. I felt no emotional attachment to the kind of inspiration he was describing. In contrast, Burt Rutan made the connection almost personal. Rutan spoke to some basic truths in the human spirit and in the imagination which made one feel compelled to do something to fulfill those childhood dreams. Dr. King's talk felt more like taking a pill. Something external to me, which I may or may not be directly responsible for bringing about, is going to somehow make everything better.

The difference in these presentation underscores, at least for me, the perceived difference in approaches to space exploration being undertaken by NASA and the new space industry. NASA seems to be indicating that they will lead by example, and merely by the act of doing these wonderful things, they will inspire young people to become future leaders in science and technology. While this may be true in some sense, I think that the new space approach feels much more personal. The main distinction is of course in the underlying sense that NASA is going to be doing these great things, and oh, the rest of us might get to watch, while many in the new space community seem to be interested in opening up the space frontier for everyone to participate.

Those are my initial impressions of the morning session. I think I have at least one more post in me wherein I will describe the afternoon session and then try to go into more detail about what I perceived to be the recurring themes of the day.


Blogger Hasan said...

Dear Mr Collins,

You seem like a cool guy living a fun life at NASA. You sound like the kind'a guy I'd like to have a beer with some day. Maybe that day will happen, but not any time soon.

Right now I'm in the middle of a "war"--no not Iraq. My war is with the particle physicists. Honestly, I don't have a qualm with them, but I'm putting forward a new model that curdles their milk. Basically, my new model accepts all the experiment stuff they've come up with & all the observational stuff all you space-people have come up with, yet is totally incompatible with the old theories used to describe things, from CPT-Violation on.

The war is raging on my Scientific American blog site:

I invite you to check it out. I expected the particle guys to be mad because I'm also advocating to shut down their biggest projects. I don't expect the space-folks to be as threatened. Think about it: with the particle folks shut down, the money that would have gone to them will likely go to you.

I need a little support in this "war." Although the full model is on Amazon, you can download the half-model for free off of either or (but I'm not sure how, I still have to talk with my webdesigner) Exact info on how to download a free copy of the model is contained in comments section of the first blog, in response to the 8th comment.

8:32 AM, December 20, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home